For details on how to write the abstract, please refer to the Lab Report section of the Chemistry Guide.
| Table 1. Evaluation criteria for the abstract Note that marks may be adjusted to take into consideration the involvement of each team member as indicated on the Degree of Involvement form: "[The] involvement, expressed as a percentage, will constitute a basis for the individual mark given in the final evaluation of this project. If a consensus is not obtained, you professor may ask you to present your points of view." | ||
| Équipe / Team : | Pondération Value (%) | Note Mark |
| Description | ||
| Contenu / Content (70%) | ||
| 1. Fidélité à la recherche / Accuracy of the research | 70 | |
| 2. Clarté des idées / Clarity of ideas | ||
| 3. Cohérence et enchainement des idées / Coherence and transition between ideas (linking of ideas, continuity) | ||
| Forme / Form (30%) | ||
| 4. Présentation et respect des consignes et longueur du travail / Presentation and adherence to instructions/guidelines and length of abstract | 30 | |
| Qualité de la langue - 0.1 de pénalité par faute sur l'ensemble des évaluations de l'épreuve synthèse du programme (sera retranché du total) Language quality - 0.1 mark per mistake on all of the evaluations of the program comprehensive assessment taken as a whole (will be taken off from the total mark) | Max -10% | |
| Autre / Other | ||
| TOTAL | 100 | |