
| Table 1. Sections to include in the lab report |
Abstract (see section entitled Abstract):
|
Report
|
| Report sections: |
Results |
Discussion |
a. Paragraph 1 |
|
i. Introduce the discussion |
ii. Discuss the execution and the effectiveness of the synthesis of biodiesel |
|
b. Paragraphs 2, 3, 4 |
i.
Discuss the analysis of biodiesel (purity and structure
elucidation). Interpret the results. Compare results to the
biodiesel standard and to literature values. |
|
c. Paragraph 5 |
i.
Evaluate the experimental errors of the synthesis and suggest
possible improvements to these errors. In other words, find one experimental
error in the synthesis and provide a recommendation (modification,
improvement) that could be made to the experiment to eliminate or
decrease the impact of this error. |
Conclusion - approximately 200 words |
a.
Brief reiteration of the results relating them to the objectives
of the experiment. Was biodiesel synthesized? Was it pure? |
b. State overall conclusions of the experiment
|
c. Invitation to broaden the debate. Suggestions for future work (future directions) |
References |
| Table 2. Evaluation of criteria for the lab report Note that marks may be adjusted to take into consideration the involvement of each team member as indicated on the Degree of Involvement form: "[The] involvement, expressed as a percentage, will constitute a basis for the individual mark given in the final evaluation of this project. If a consensus is not obtained, you professor may ask you to present your points of view." | ||
| Équipe / Team : | Pondération Value (%) | Note Mark |
| Description | ||
| Contenu scientifique et rigueur / Scientific content and thoroughness (80%) | ||
| 1. Exactitude du contenu scientifique / Accuracy of scientific information | 70 | |
a. Objectifs / Objectives | ||
b. Synthèse du biodiesel / Synthesis of biodiesel | ||
c. Analyse du biodiesel / Analysis of biodiesel | ||
d. Discussion, conclusion, erreurs expérimentales / Discussion, conclusions, experimental errors | ||
| 2. Clarté, précision, cohérence et organisation / Clarity, precision, coherence/unity and organization | 10 | |
| Forme / Form (20%) | ||
| 3. Qualité de la présentation (aspect soigné, lisibilité, organisation, format du texte, tableaux, figures, graphiques, etc. ) /Presentation quality (neatness, legibility, organization, format of text, tables, figures, graphs, etc.) | 10 | |
| 4. Médiagraphie : style bibliographique, méthode d'appel des références dans le texte, style, format, crédibilité, présence des sources appropriées, sources originales citées / Referencing: style, format, credibility, presence of appropriate sources, original sources cited | 10 | |
| Qualité de la langue - 0.1 de pénalité par faute sur l'ensemble des évaluations de l'épreuve synthèse du programme (sera retranché du total) Language quality - 0.1 mark per mistake on all of the evaluations of the program comprehensive assessment taken as a whole (will be taken off from the total mark) | Max -10% | |
| Autre / Other | ||
| TOTAL | 100 | |