
Once your professor has approved the third analytical method you chose to use to analyze your biodiesel, you must complete a prelab - detailed plan:
| Table 1. Evaluation of criteria for the prelab - detailed plan for the synthesis of biodiesel Note that marks may be adjusted to take into consideration the involvement of each team member as indicated on the Degree of Involvement form: "[The] involvement, expressed as a percentage, will constitute a basis for the individual mark given in the final evaluation of this project. If a consensus is not obtained, you professor may ask you to present your points of view." | ||
| Équipe / Team : | Pondération Value (%) | Note Mark |
| Description | ||
| Contenu scientifique et rigueur / Scientific content and thoroughness (60%) | ||
| 1. Exactitude et pertinence de l'information / Accuracy and pertinence (relevance) of information | 50 | |
| 2. Clarté, précision, cohérence et organisation / Clarity, precision, coherence/unity and organization | 10 | |
| Sources (20%) | ||
| 3. Méthodes analytiques doivent être supportées par le nombre de sources indiqué / Analytical methods must be supported by number of sources indicated | 10 | |
| 4. Validité et crédibilité scientifique des sources, sources originales citées / Scientific validity and credibility of sources, original sources cited | 10 | |
| Forme / Form (20%) | ||
| 5. Qualité de la présentation du plan détaillé / Presentation fquality of detailed outline | 10 | |
| 6. Présentation de la médiagraphie : style, format / Presentation of references: style, format | 10 | |
| Qualité de la langue - 0.1 de pénalité par faute sur l'ensemble des évaluations de l'épreuve synthèse du programme (sera retranché du total) Language quality - 0.1 mark per mistake on all of the evaluations of the program comprehensive assessment taken as a whole (will be taken off from the total mark) | Max -10% | |
| Autre / Other | ||
| TOTAL | 100 | |